Who This Is For
This is not for organizations at the beginning of their cloud journey. It is for those 12 to 24 months post-migration who are realizing that getting to Azure and operating Azure are two different problems.
You have monitoring but no confidence in what it is actually watching
Costs are unpredictable and the tagging hygiene from the migration never got cleaned up
Policy exists on paper, but the environment has drifted and nobody owns enforcement
You are about to onboard another team or product and the platform is not ready to hold the weight
The team that built it has moved on and institutional knowledge left with them
You are being asked to scale something that was never designed to scale
How It Works
Every engagement starts in the same place: a clear assessment of what you actually have before recommending what you should do. The path forward is chosen from evidence, not assumptions.
A direct conversation about your current environment, the problem you are trying to solve, and whether this is the right engagement for it. This is mutual qualification. You are deciding if I am the right fit. I am deciding if I can add real value to your situation.
No pitch. No proposal template. Just an honest conversation.
A structured review of your current Azure environment covering operational posture, governance state, observability coverage, and architecture integrity. Delivered as a written report that includes current state, risk surface, and a prioritized path forward naming which engagements apply and why.
The deliverable is yours. If you choose to act on it independently, you can. If you want to continue, the Assessment becomes the foundation for everything that follows.
The assessment covers:
- Monitoring coverage and alert reliability
- Policy enforcement and environment drift
- Cost visibility and tagging hygiene
- RBAC structure and ownership clarity
- Organizational accountability gaps
- Prioritized recommendations with rationale
Engagement Paths
The Assessment identifies which of the following apply to your environment. Each can be engaged individually or combined. All are available as standalone fixed-scope projects or as part of the monthly retainer.
Platform Observability
From $2,000For environments where monitoring exists but nobody trusts it. Alert noise has replaced signal. Dashboards are built but not acted on. Incidents arrive from users before they arrive from tools.
Deliverables include:
- Observability design covering what to watch and why
- Alert thresholds that reflect actual operational risk
- Runbook triggers and escalation paths
- Ownership assignments so signal produces action
- Log Analytics and Azure Monitor rationalization
The technical fix without the organizational accountability structure produces better-looking dashboards nobody acts on. Both layers get addressed.
Governance & Scale
From $2,000For environments where policy exists on paper but enforcement is inconsistent, costs are climbing without clear attribution, and the environment no longer resembles the original design.
Deliverables include:
- Governance framework with enforcement approach
- Azure Policy definitions and remediation roadmap
- Cost control structure and tagging standards
- RBAC rationalization and ownership model
- Organizational clarity on who enforces what
Governance that blocks teams creates shadow IT. The goal is a framework that enables speed by removing ambiguity, not one that adds friction.
Platform Design
From $2,500For organizations planning a migration, a significant expansion, or a rebuild of a platform that was shipped fast the first time. The goal is architecture that does not create the operational debt the other two paths fix.
Deliverables include:
- Reference architecture with decision rationale
- Implementation roadmap with sequencing
- Observability and governance baked into the design
- Organizational readiness assessment
- Platform decisions documented so they survive team changes
Platform decisions compound. A weak foundation does not just slow you down today. It limits what you can build on top of it for years.
For organizations that need sustained architecture guidance, not a one-time fix. The retainer covers both organizational advisory and hands-on technical deliverables. Weekly touchpoints, async availability, and active architecture work within the monthly hours.
This is selective. I work with retainer clients where I can add real value over time, not where I am filling hours. The Assessment and initial engagement determine fit before the retainer conversation happens.
Organizational
- Architecture decision support
- Stakeholder communication guidance
- Team structure and ownership review
- Technology selection advisory
Technical
- Hands-on implementation work
- Policy and governance deliverables
- Observability design and configuration
- Architecture documentation
Twenty years. Helpdesk to platform architecture. Healthcare, energy, finance, SaaS. Built managed services from scratch as employee #2 at 10th Magnitude. Currently Senior Product Architect at Rackspace. Over 100 Azure environments. The pattern recognition that comes from that volume is what you are actually buying.
View Full BackgroundStart a Conversation
Fill out what you can. The more context you provide, the more useful the Discovery Call will be. If you are not sure how to answer something, skip it.