Platform Resiliency - Part 1: The Promise That Couldnt Travel
Why SRE adoption failed outside Google and what we learned from attempting to transplant a complete system rather than adapting principles to organizational reality.

SRE failed outside Google because the promise couldn't travel. Here's a promise that can.
Site Reliability Engineering promised to solve operational pain through engineering discipline. For most organizations, it didn’t deliver. The SRE team became another operations team with a different name. Toil reduction became a talking point instead of a practice. The feedback loop between incidents and platform improvements never closed.
This series diagnoses why SRE failed outside its native environment and proposes a reframe: resiliency as a platform design principle rather than a team function.
Google had preconditions most organizations don’t: engineering-led culture, massive scale that justified the investment, authority granted to SRE teams to enforce standards. When organizations adopted SRE without those preconditions, they got the terminology without the transformation.
The model wasn’t wrong. It was context-dependent. And nobody said that out loud.
Part 1: The Promise That Couldn’t Travel Why SRE worked at Google and failed elsewhere. The structural dependencies hidden in the model. How “we do SRE” became a badge without the substance.
Part 2: The Promise That Can Resiliency reframed as platform architecture. Operations responds to incidents. Platform prevents categories of incidents. The boundary is clear: operations handles what happened, platform ensures it doesn’t happen again.
Part 3: Promises Made, Promises Kept Making it operational. Requiring platform action items from incident reviews. Reserving platform capacity for hardening work. Enforcing resiliency standards through the platform. The Monday checklist that starts the flywheel.
The feedback loop between operations and platform teams is what turns incidents into improvements. Without that loop, you’re just firefighting forever. With it, every incident makes the next one less likely.
Platform Resiliency doesn’t require organizational restructure. It clarifies boundaries rather than redrawing org charts. It creates habits rather than demanding transformation.
Operations teams tired of firefighting the same categories of problems. Platform architects looking for a model that fits their actual authority. Leaders who adopted SRE and wondered why it didn’t transform anything. Anyone holding an “SRE” title and feeling disconnected from the original philosophy.
This series builds on The Platform Layer and depends on the leadership patterns in Decide or Drown. It extends into Confidence Engineering where AI capabilities get housed in the platform layer.
Be water, my friend. The framework adapts to your container. Your organization is the cup, the bottle, the teapot. Platform Resiliency takes the shape you need it to take.

Why SRE adoption failed outside Google and what we learned from attempting to transplant a complete system rather than adapting principles to organizational reality.

How to implement resiliency as a design principle woven into platform architecture, with practical guidance for operations teams and AI integration.

Practical steps to implement Platform Resiliency on Monday morning - from drawing clear boundaries to enforcing standards through the platform.